Symbolism in Sonnys Blues by James Baldwin free essay sample

Imagery in â€Å"Sonny’s Blues† by James Baldwin In James Baldwin’s â€Å"Sonny’s Blues,† the peruser meets Sonny, a recuperating someone who is addicted, and his more established sibling, a secondary teacher. Despite the fact that these two siblings have totally various lives and characters, the author’s utilization of imagery unites them all the more firmly like a genuine family. Baldwin utilizes images, for example, ice, daintiness and murkiness, and jazz music to add more profundity and importance to â€Å"Sonny’s Blues. † People for the most part consider ice or the virus as being unpleasant and causing distress. At the point when it is cold outside, individuals wear coats to take out the harshness of the virus. In â€Å"Sonny’s Blues,† Sonny utilizes champion to get away from the inconvenience of the truth that is his life. Champion is Sonny’s coat. Additionally, ice can represent trepidation, fear, and the sentiment of being agitated. At the point when the storyteller, Sonny’s more established sibling, first peruses the paper and discovers that Sonny was captured, â€Å"he felt as though an extraordinary square of ice was sitting in his stomach†¦It sent little streams of water here and there his veins, however never got less† (50). The ice that the storyteller feels in his stomach is really the inclination of alarm. The storyteller is terrified for his sibling and he feels mostly regretful for not helping him in his period of scarcity. At the point when the ice is liquefying within the narrator’s stomach, the dismay and stun is at long last contracting until the ice sends the streams through his veins to advise him that something awful has occurred. Another case of the image of ice utilized by Baldwin is the point at which a beloved companion of Sonny’s comes up to the storyteller and inquires as to whether he has heard the terrible news. Sonny’s companion enlightens the storyteller regarding what will befall Sonny after he is discharged from recovery and the storyteller feels the ice once more, â€Å"the same fear he had felt all day† (52). A similar fear that the storyteller was feeling before that day is returning in light of the fact that he realizes that it will be his duty to water over his more youthful sibling. Baldwin’s utilization of ice in his story gives the peruser a superior comprehension of the narrator’s trepidation and fear. Additionally, Baldwin’s image of ice clarifies one reason that made Sonny have a dependence on courageous woman. Another image that Baldwin utilizes all through the story is the image of gentility and dimness. Gentility and dimness typically represent great and vil. One case of obscurity that Baldwin utilizes in â€Å"Sonny’s Blues† is when Mama, the narrator’s mother, was enlightening him concerning the demise of his and Sonny’s uncle. After Mama recounted to the narrative of the brothers’ uncle being run over and executed by a vehicle loaded with white men, she stated, â€Å"Your Daddy says he at no point ever considered anyt hing to be dim as that street after the lights of that vehicle had gone away† (58). In this model, Baldwin utilizes the obscurity of the street to make a more profound significance behind the uncle’s passing and the father’s pity. The explanation the dad felt as though nothing would ever be as dim as that street is on the grounds that he encounters his lone sibling biting the dust before him. Demise, particularly murder, is viewed as a very â€Å"dark† subject. When there is a burial service, for the most part every individual is sporting dark or dim garments since he is grieving over the demise of a friend or family member. Another model is the point at which the storyteller thinks back when the entirety of the ‘old folks’ would lounge around in the family room after chapel. â€Å"They would all demonstration the seats while the night is crawling up outside, yet nobody knows it yet†¦everyone is taking a gander at something a youngster can't see† (56). Baldwin utilizes the dimness of night as an image of death in this statement in light of the fact that the sun is setting on the â€Å"old folks’† lives. Additionally, the storyteller says that the youngsters can't see passing since they are too you to comprehend why life closes. Baldwin’s utilization of the image of obscurity here adds profundity to the way that the youngsters don't see life in similar manners that grown-ups do on the grounds that kids have quite recently begun their lives while the grown-ups have just lived a large portion of their lives. Then again, light represents the entirety of the idealistic and confident segments that are a piece of life. At times gentility is utilized to represent salvation. Baldwin utilizes light to indicate the beneficial things that to Sonny. For example, toward the finish of the story as Sonny plays with his jazz band in a little club, the storyteller says, â€Å"There isn't some other story to advise, it is the main light we have in this darkness† (70). The â€Å"tale† is the story of what the blue is about that Creole tells as he plays his fiddle. Baldwin utilizes this announcement to add importance to Sonny’s life by indicating that music is his light. Through his music, Sonny escapes from all the dimness and enduring of his existence; jazz music is Sonny’s salvation. James Baldwin utilizes light to show warmth and confidence in the characters’ lives. Jazz music in â€Å"Sonny’s Blues† is emblematic in various approaches to the characters. The storyteller believes that jazz music is â€Å"beneath Sonny† (59). He connects jazz music with the sort of individuals who are not genuine about existence. To the storyteller, jazz music represents Sonny’s dependence on champion. Baldwin utilizes the jazz music to exhibit the disdain that the storyteller has towards performers and medications. The narrator’s sicken of jazz music shows that he just needs more for his more youthful brother’s life. Sonny is the direct inverse of his more seasoned sibling with regards to jazz music; jazz is essentially Sonny’s life. The storyteller depicts the music Sonny plays and says, â€Å"Sonny’s finger filled the air with life, his life† (70). In Baldwin’s â€Å"Sonny’s Blues,† jazz music represents a break from life for Sonny. Sonny can recount to his story and his enduring playing jazz music. Additionally, toward the finish of the story, the image of jazz music makes to some degree a tie between the two siblings. At the point when the storyteller watches Sonny play at the club, he finds out about an entirely different side to his sibling that he never knew. The storyteller at long last starts to welcome the ‘blues’ that artists are gotten through just to play their music. Baldwin’s utilization of the image of jazz music makes a more profound understanding and significance behind â€Å"Sonny’s Blues. † Ice, softness and dimness, and jazz music are images that James Baldwin utilizes in his story to make profundity and more profound importance. His utilization of the image of ice adds profundity to how the storyteller feels when he initially knows about Sonny’s capture. The image of softness and obscurity makes a more profound significance of the great and the awful things that occur in the characters’ lives all through the story.

Islamic poltical sceince and culture Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Islamic poltical sceince and culture - Essay Example thin migrants bunches up to shape the more noteworthy psychological warfare arrange that continue growing with expanding following and specialists appointed in various nations (Cesari 87). This is the situation of France which in late past experienced viciousness executed by Muslims associated fear bunches against the Jews foundations. Some banned gatherings like Salafist impact in mosques and supplication rooms in France and listed 541 activists is viewed as their encroachment on security governs consequently opposition towards integration.The 9/11 fear assault in the US has similarly depict Muslims as a danger to harmony and security henceforth the difficulties of reconciliation experienced by the Muslims people group (Cesari 87). The social orders in western countries practice liberal way of life that fundamentally separates from the Muslim culture which is increasingly saved. In USA for example, the youthful age drives an extremely dynamic common way of life and this is probably going to bargain their perception of the Muslim preservationists. The Muslim foreigner network living US has along these lines discovered it truly testing to incorporate in the enormous social culture of the liberal society. This is one significant impediment presented by the getting society against the endeavors of incorporation by the

Mythology free essay sample

The Myths are brimming with the examples of the mercilessness of the divine beings. Giving numerous models, talk about the purposes behind the god’s savagery. Is it constantly defended? What does the mercilessness of the divine beings state about the Greeks perspective on the universe? Leading let’s talk about what a fantasy is; a story, something that was made up a quite a while prior, with its motivation to engage. Also, in view of amusement esteem man made up these stories, or fantasies. The stories included a wide range of story lines, for example, sentiment, various characters, wars, and issues. Huge numbers of the fantasies had stories of brutality, however from the Greek Gods the stories were revolved around. These divine beings were considered legends much of the time, investigate Hercules for instance, he is depicted in the content (p. 569) as â€Å"the most noteworthy legend of Greece. † But take a look at his story, and you will see that he could be considered the most fierce. We will compose a custom article test on Folklore or then again any comparable point explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page Hercules was the child to Zeus and a human spouse, which Juno, Zeus’s Goddess wife (and sister), didn't support of and never let Hercules survive. It really made him go insane and murder his significant other and 3 children, before ousting himself from the divine beings and that family to look for absolution. He additionally tries to become and undying god when he goes over Hera and is advised to do these twelve works which were all increasingly fierce, and marginally indecent, at that point the following, kill this mammoth, murder that evil spirit, and take from this god, clean after that one. In spite of the fact that savage the demonstrations of certain divine beings all through the fantasies, they do appear to keep still in their motivation to engage, the accounts are as yet being told. Consider it if in the story there wasn’t a trouble maker, or a sentiment occurring, the story needs a plot something energizing that paves the way to a peak, etc, for the timespan that fantasies were coming to fruition and the zone they got from that point is nothing unexpected that there is viciousness. At exactly that point this wasn’t considered an issue these fantasies were really used to clarify day by day phenomenon’s and show exercises too. Brutality was a regular event then whether it was chasing for supper or their concept of sports viciousness was available so obviously it was available in their stories. Not exclusively was savagery not equivalent to we consider it the primary characters in the accounts were divine beings, undying creatures, that couldn't be blamed under any circumstance, they were totally legitimized in their genuine universe of pretend. The battled with one another, they killed mammoths, demolished things and creatures, and this was their method of living it was a battle to get to the top kind mentality. The men were macho, they went out and battled like warriors and chased, while much like the fantasies the ladies were the objects of sentiment and fruitfulness and such animals. What does this sort of demeanor toward savagery state about the Greeks? Of that time nothing, they were making up these accounts off what they knew and lived, at that point additionally adding a misrepresented creative mind to the blend and got legends. What does it say about their perspective on the universe? Well the Greeks thought they were better than others, that they basically were simply the divine beings and had the force. They thought were interminable and better and progressively dazzling then different societies of the time.

Nuclear Warfare A Conflict of Deterrence - Free Essay Example

Nuclear warfare is often posited as essentially different from conventional warfare.   Certainly they are conceived of as so, since dominating the cultural imagination in the Second World War (Gamson, 1989, 2).   Dozens of films have been made depicting disasters caused by nuclear war in the past few decades, especially when the threat was most imminent during the cold war, and these films generally depict nuclear weapons as distinct from other violent weapons of war (Perrine viii, 1998). This differentiation is further mirrored in fiction which heavily suggests that psychologically, nuclear weapons are perceived as different and unique.   But does this psychological classification reflect real differences, or are nuclear weapons simply the most dangerous weapon of war on a continuum of deadly weapons?   Examining the history and the policy trends since the first use of the weapons, I argue that nuclear warfare is different not because the weapons themselves are deadlier, but because their damage is inflicted on all participants in the war; as a result, nuclear states pursue a policy of deterrence through mutually assured destruction (MAD). To evaluate nuclear war and weapons in comparison with conventional war and weapons and determine their difference, if any does exist, I will use two main criteria.   First, I will examine the violent capabilities of nuclear weapons compared to war fought with conventional weapons and second, I will examine how these weapons are interpreted and used in international relations.   I conclude that the difference between conventional warfare and nuclear warfare is not the weapons themselves, as the damage in terms of destruction of lives, infrastructure, and landscape can be matched by other forms of violence; however, the way in which nuclear weapons perform this violence causes them to be interrupted differently, and this different interpretation means that the way political entities view and use them is also different. Nuclear weapons are understood to be distinct from conventional weapons precisely because of their increased destructive capacity, a capacity which negates the goal of warfare.   Here, war is seen as a tactic used for the purpose of gaining power in a struggle between organised political groups. As such, it is a political instrument, the resort to force to advance political purposes and to settle political conflicts between sovereign communities (Cohen and Lee, 1986, 9).   In a rational political system, in order to go to war, the party waging it must believe that the end result will be conditions so preferable to the pre-war ones that they justify both the risk and the cost of war.   In short, the object of war is to attain a better peace.   Victory in the true sense implies that the state of peace, for ones people, is better after the war than before (Hart 1974, 353).   If nothing can be gained by war, then it is illogical to wage. Because nuclear warfare has the distinct possibility of destroying whole continents, it can be said it is distinct from conventional war. Moreover, the threat of its use can be utilised as an effective diplomatic tool in a way that conventional war cannot really match. This notion provides the foundations behind th e theory of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) which assumes that the threat of global devastation is sufficient to deter states from conflict (Sokolski 2004, v). MAD also supports the notion that the possession or development of these weapons gives a state power, however it would be illogical for such a state to utilise them. For example, India views its official defence policy as a doctrine which expressly calls for deterrence by threat of putative retaliation via their nuclear force (Sokolski 2004, 293).   If India were to be attacked by nuclear weapons, so long as India still retained the possibility of striking back with its own weapons à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" a distinct possibility as the technology stands today à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" then its counter-attack would be destructive enough to the aggressor as to nullify the original aims.   In short, to a rational actor, nuclear warfare would never be worth the risk, and therefore, it can be suggested that possessing destruct ive weapons is the key to peace. Unfortunately, the counter to this theory argues that nuclear weapons are not a special kind of weapon, and simply function as a deterrent today because they are the latest weapon.   Indeed, there is a history of other weapons which have also been seen as destructive enough to destroy the aims of war.   In the escalation of violence during World War II for example, the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were only marginally more horrific in terms of destruction of life and property than the firebombing of Tokyo and Dresden which were conducted through the use of so-called conventional weapons (Leviton 1991, 252). Moreover, the holocaust of Nanking by Japan early in the war certainly wrought similar levels devastation though it took the matter of days rather than seconds (Chang 2012, 15). Looking further back into history, civilisation-ending destruction has always been a consequence of war.   When the Golden Horde of the Mongol s attacked the northern Chinese Jin, the most advanced and populated cities in the world at the time, the death toll was in the millions as the Mongols ground the cities into dust.   Moreover, at the time, it also appeared that death on that scale was both unprecedented and unlikely to occur again. The scale of this attack is demonstrated by this account from Arab historian Ibn al-Athir (1160-1233) a tremendous disaster such as [this] had never happened beforeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦It may well be that the world from now until its endà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦will not experience the like of it again (Burgan 2009, 27).   Looking back even earlier to the Punic Wars, Carthage was destroyed with the Roman equivalent of weapons of mass destruction: salt sewn into the ground to prevent life from ever emerging again (Cornell, 2012, 443).   Biological and chemical pathogens are newer, but equally deadly and fast-acting: mustard gas, for example, became taboo after its effective use for mas s-slaughter by the Germans in World War I (Price 1997, 61). This historical overview shows that the deadliness of nuclear weapons in terms of capacities to destroy civilisations and their civilian populations is not unique. While the decades of research and development since Hiroshima and Nagasaki have certainly amplified the deadliness of the weapons, their capability to kill is not unique. What has changed from the days of Carthage, though, is the speed at which this destruction is done.   This is because a state, once the victim of a nuclear attack, can possibility still retain the ability to launch a nuclear retaliation, and in so doing, create enough to do mass destruction to the victor.   Complete destruction has always been a possible outcome in warfare, but the ability to win a war and still be destroyed to the point that life is no longer sustainable is unique to modernity. As nuclear scholar Cohen writes, a state in a post-nuclear war would not be whi ch political system would survive, but whether any would (Cohen 1986, 9). This categorical difference of MAD makes nuclear warfare an irrational act, waged only by a nihilist system unconcerned with its own existence.   However, these weapons obviously play a role in the international system.   There are two reasons for this.   First, the weapons are not ubiquitous; only a few developed countries have the weapons, giving them a clear military advantage over non-nuclear states.   So long as this advantage remains, deterrence via mutually assured destruction is not possible.   This is one of the reasons which nuclear countries refuse to completely destroy their arsenals; moreover, it becomes a reason for non-nuclear states to pursue such weapons. States will seek to develop nuclear weapons when they face a significant military threat that cannot be met through alternative means (Sagan 2007, 54). Put simply, if two states are in conflict, and neith er possess a weapon which will cause mutually assured destruction, the weaker state will seek such a weapon as an insurance policy.   At the same time, third party states both with and without such weapons will oppose the acquisition, as expanding the nuclear club is only an advantage to the state seeking admittance. Because having nuclear weapons is so important for deterrence, states in possession cannot abandon them nor publically claim that they will not use these weapons.  Ãƒâ€šÃ‚   This how the paradox of nuclear deterrence is reached.   States seeking to avoid nuclear warfare must therefore make a credible commitment to use them; if such a commitment cannot be made, then other states will not be afraid of attacking.   As Cohen summarizes: threatening to do what would serve no political purpose [launch a war of mutually assured destruction] is the only way to avoid nuclear war (Cohen 1986, 10). This principle of nuclear deterrence leads to bri nksmanship behaviour, where nuclear powers continually assert their readiness to use the weapons.  Ãƒâ€šÃ‚   Such behaviour can be observed especially during the Cold War, where the USSR and the USA both threatened nuclear war precisely because they did not wish it to occur.   In the Cuban Missile Crisis, for example, both states demonstrated their willingness to use weapons; it was because their wiliness was so well demonstrated that neither side felt free to use them (Trachtenberg 1985, 142). Had either power capitulated early, the other would have felt free to attack. Since the end of the Cold War, brinkmanship behaviour exists only between actively hostile states.   The USA, not having a serious rival in the unipolar international system, no longer needs to demonstrate its wiliness to use its arsenal.   Where brinksmanship is seen is between states such as India and Pakistan, where both states have reason to engage in conflict and both possess nuclear weapons (Kroenig 2013, 147).  Ãƒâ€š Adding to MAD, there are two other factors which determine nuclear behaviour: psychological categorisation of nuclear weapons as worse and more inhumane than other weapons, and the existence of non-rational actors with the possibility of becoming nuclear powers.   The psychologically distinct category of nuclear weapons arose in part due to the significant pushback against the weapons after the Second World War.   While the violence and destruction caused by the bombs was not significantly worse, as I earlier argued, the newness and manner of destruction caused them to be singled out for condemnation (Tannenwald 2007, 74). As a result, political leaders have come to see them as taboo à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" that using them or even advocating using them is a breach of ethnics, and that discussing using them in a democratic setting will prohibit election (Wittner 2009, 49). Unfortunately, the existence of a nuclea r taboo creates a problem for democratic politicians who must, by the principles of MAD, continue to pursue brinkmanship behaviour. As a result, a type of doublespeak emerges from nuclear powers.   In order to maintain the image that they are humanitarian and with the added purposes of maintaining relative military power by preventing the spread of nuclear weapons, they must condemn nuclear force.   At the same time, however, these leaders must continually suggest that they are willing to use the weapons if necessary (Bundy 1988, 536). Finally, in the post-September 11th world, nuclear powers have become increasingly concerned with the actions of non-rational or non-state actors who might use not operate by the principles of MAD.   Because non-rational or non-state actors have nothing to lose, they therefore have no reason to prevent them from using such a weapon.   As a result, nuclear policy of the twenty-first century has focused on containing weapo ns of mass destruction (Cirincion 2014, 293).   This focus on containing non-state actors is because, should MAD be properly used against other rational states with comparative military power, these actors represent the greatest threat to the nuclear state. In sum, nuclear warfare compared to conventional warfare is not different in terms of the scale of possible destruction inflicted on the losing state.   However, because the destruction occurs much faster and the losing state is capable of inflicting such a serious blow to the victorious state that negates the entire purpose of war, nuclear warfare is unique.   As a result, the weapons have taken on a psychological taboo as well as a commitment by rational actors not to use them, precisely by threatening to use them.   These powers are also eager to see that nuclear weapons do not spread to new states or non-state actors. It is this paradox that has defined military strategy since the Second World W ar. Bibliography Bundy, M. (1988) Danger and Survival. Random House.   New York. Burgan, M. (2009) Empire of the Mongols. Infobase Publishing. New York. Chang, I.(2012) The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II. Basic Books. 2012. Cohen, A and Lee, S. (1986) Nuclear Weapons and the Future of Humanity: The Fundamental Questions. Rowman and Littlefield. Totowa, New Jersey. Cornell, T. (2012)The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å"264 BC). Routledge. London and New York. Gamson, W. and Modigliani, A. (1989) Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach. American Journal of Sociology. 95(1): 1-37. Hart, B.H. (1974) Strategy. The New American Library.   New York. Kroenig, M. (2013) Nuclear Superiority and the Balance of Resolve: Explaining Nuclear Crisis Outcomes. International Organization67(1): 141-171. Perrine, T. (1998) Film and the Nuclear Age: Re presenting Cultural Anxiety. Taylor and Francis. New York London. Price, R. (1997)The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Cornell University Press. New York. Sagan, S. (2007) Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons: Three Models in Search of a Bomb. International Security. 21(3): 54-86. Sokolski, H. (2004) Getting Mad: Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction, Its Causes and Practices. Strategic Studies Institute. Trachtenberg, M. (1985) The Influence of Nuclear Weapons in the Cuban Missile Crisis. International Security. 137-163. Wittner, L (2009). Confronting the Bomb: A Short History of the Nuclear Disarmament Movement. Stanford University Press. New York.

Supporting American Imperialism - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 2 Words: 466 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/04/04 Category Politics Essay Level High school Tags: Imperialism Essay Did you like this example? American imperialism is basically America gaining more power. I personally support imperialism. I have five main points to why I support imperialism. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Supporting American Imperialism" essay for you Create order My first point is sharing the economic factors. During US imperialism, it was a top priority and there were high hopes to find new areas and markets for trading. Through imperialism, the United States has made new trading partners and it has opened new trade markets. As a specific example, through imperialism, the US opened up trade with East Asia. My second point, is the political benefits of imperialism. Throughout the World, countrys are always competing with others for supremacy. They want to have power or strength over the others. They want this for multiple common reasons, like strong national pride and the best security for their citizens. It is needed for the countrys to be strong and able to defend themselves. Through imperialism, different countries with the same beliefs can come together to work together, support each other, defend each other, trade together, go to War together and more. Having good relationships with different countries is truly crucial and imperialism helps support it. When countries go to war, they need to know that they have other countries supporting them. The third point I am going to be sharing about is the religious benefits through imperialism. Throughout most all imperial expansions, missionaries are involved. Religious people called missionaries go to places, mainly newly discovered, and try to have people convert to their personal religions or beliefs. For example, today many Christians go to Africa to serve and speak about God. Throughout history this happened very often. Back to how this affects imperialism, missionaries from different nations want to gain more people who believe the same things as them and their home country. Its not all exclusive to religions though. Some nations share education as well. Moving on, my fourth point is plainly exploration. Humans are curious, its in our genetics. Some nations just want to explore unknown territory. Often this can be for medical or scientific research, to seek out natural resources, or it could simply be for an adventure. Imperial explorers were hungry to discover, map, and claim new territory. All, before their competition, because its in our genes to be competitive as well. Some explorers did it strictly for personal glory, but it still benefited their countries. My fifth and final point on why I support imperialism is the huge geographic benefits. This one really ties in and connects with most of my other points. By having more land, you can do many more things. You can have more natural resources, easier trade routes, room for a larger population, and more. As you can see, I strongly support imperialism and believe it has benefits on America economically, religiously, geographically, exploratory, and politically.

Emotional Intelligence An Effective Leader - 1322 Words

1. Leadership: the ability to inspire, influence, and motivate oneself and others interpersonally and energetically. Leaders inspire greatness within themselves and each person he/she engages – daily. Leadership is a way of life, a vector, a learned behavior to sharpen through challenges, opportunities, relationships, and experiences. Leadership is not a destination; it is a journey of self-mastery and self-actualization. The moment we stop learning, we have failed ourselves and those in our circle of influence. 2. People are my passion, and I am passionate about effective leadership. I challenge myself daily to ensure I am meeting people where they are, finding compassion and understanding, and expressing empathy and genuine†¦show more content†¦These experiences are valuable learning tools and have also helped to define my passion for leadership. 4. Captain Joe Conroy was my first commanding officer in the Coast Guard. Being a man of few words, each member of the crew knew where he/she stood with him and wanted to perform to the highest potential and ability. Captain Conroy was like a father figure to most; he empowered his officers to lead and trusted the crew to complete their tasks with minimal oversight. Captain Conroy led with passion, love of the Coast Guard, and his crew. His leadership taught me to believe in myself and others and that positivity alone will inspire greatness in all. 5. Master Chief Eric Engle made a tremendous impact on my understanding of leadership and the importance of accountability. I met Eric when I was a young, impressionable chief. He taught me what it means to be a chief through accountability. Upon my first meeting with him, I was very intimidated by his presence as he commanded respect with his anchors. As a young chief, I did not understand the meaning of the anchor until going through the Chief’s Call to Indoctrination process where he was the Chief of the Mess. He held chiefs accountable without fear or reprisal and in whatever manner he deemed necessary. I appreciated learning from him and understood the importance of being present in the mess and the importance of accountability.

Much Ado About Nothing †Links between Beatrice and Benedick’s relationship and Shakespeare’s Sonnets Essay Example For Students

Much Ado About Nothing – Links between Beatrice and Benedick’s relationship and Shakespeare’s Sonnets Essay Shakespeare is famously known for his plays and sonnets, he lived during the 17th Century yet his work is still constantly being celebrated, analysed and enjoyed everyday. One theme that was clear throughout many of his pieces is the theme of love; whether it be obvious or underlying, romantic or lustful. The notion of romantic love is often explored in his sonnets; a typical sonnet is 14 lines in length with a strict rhyme-scheme and also iambic pentameter, it could be suggested that the strict sonnet form is an analogy for unwavering and timeless, true love. In contrast, in â€Å"Much Ado About Nothing† the duration of the acts and scenes vary wildly, this could be suggested to represent the different types of love that feature in the play. Much Ado About Nothing is one of Shakespeare’s most famous comedies; it is set in Messina and centres on two pairs of lovers, Beatrice and Benedick and Hero and Claudio. In the very first scene of the play the audience can already see that Beatrice has distaste for Benedick and his childish ways as she refers to him as ‘Signior Mountanto’ when asking about his well-being. We are also told that there is a ‘kind of merry war betwixt Signior Benedick and her’ by Leonato, her Uncle and soon after we see them quarrelling with each other. In contrast, during Act 1 Scene 1, Hero and Claudio seem to fall in love with each other effortlessly; even though they have not yet spoken to each other, Claudio still professes that ‘she is the sweetest lady’ that he h ad ever seen, this signifies that he has simply fallen in love with her for her looks and that his love for her is not genuine. The theme of love is present throughout the entire play but sometimes it is unclear whether it is true, romantic love or simply lustful. It is seemingly obvious to their friends that Beatrice and Benedick are deeply in love without even realising it and their frequent exchanges of witty banter add a comic effect as well as demonstrate the chemistry and compatibility between the two of them. Their comments are often quick and sharp, in Act 1 Scene 1 Beatrice challenges Benedick when she says ‘I wonder that you will still be talking, Signor Benedick, nobody marks you’ however Benedick quickly retorts ‘What, my dear Lady Disdain! Are you yet living† this makes it clear to the reader that they are equal sparring partners. As we read on it is indicated that Beatrice and Benedick had had a previous encounter of love together; while talking to Don Perdo about Benedick’s heart, she states ‘he lent it me a while, and I gave him use for it, a double heart for his single one’ this not only implies that they were romantically involved together but also that the love that she ‘gave’ to him was not reciprocated. The idea of unrequited love is also explored in Shakespeare’s sonnet 87 where he writes ‘Farewell, thou are too dear for my possessing†¦My bonds in thee are all determinated’ in this sonnet, the speaker seems to believe that their love interest is worth more than them, this could be in wealth or they are in a higher position of power socially, and it is also said that the bonds that attach them together have been broken, some people may say that his personal experience of unrequited love is immanent throughout the play. Although most of Shakespeare’s sonnets are focused on romantics and the beauty of the mistress or lover, sonnet 130 portrays his love for this woman in a different light; the mistress that Shakespeare is describing is said to have ‘black wires’ growing on her head and that ‘coral is far more red than her lips’ red’ all of this implies that she is not attractive, has black course hair and pale lips; unlike most women described in poems or sonnets. Some critics have said that this sonnet satirises the poetic and social conventions of courtly love, and many others state that Beatrice and Benedick’s relationship is much like this as they openly mock each other and their love was based on deception, even if their feelings for each other are ‘true’. .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 , .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 .postImageUrl , .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 , .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079:hover , .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079:visited , .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079:active { border:0!important; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079:active , .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079 .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0f459d620a2a4fc3afbb88bdbcd3e079:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Major role in the novel EssayHowever, many people believe that the final couplet at the end of Sonnet 130 reveals that the love in the piece is pragmatic rather than sarcastic, William Flesch, a famous English professor considers the sonnet to be a compliment as it does not make false comparisons, unlike many other poetic pieces of that time. This view can also relate to the realistic and down to earth relationship of Beatrice and Benedick, have a mutual trust and respect for each other and recognise each other’s flaws however they both still care greatly for each other. During Act 2, Scene 1 Beatrice describes Benedick ‘like my lady’s eldest son, everm ore tattling’ when describing him to PUT BENEDICK KNOWING HER FLAWS AND DEVELOP THIS MORE. It could be suggested that pieces of Beatrice and Benedick’s relationship are evident in many of Shakespeare’s work, especially in his romantic sonnets; in sonnets 116 love is compared to the North Star; â€Å"It is the star to every wandering bark† Love is compared to the north star because the north start is commonly known to guide lost sailors, just like how love is known to guide lost men and women. In the Elizabethan Era, it was common for women to marry young, have children and look after their family however it was socially unacceptable at the time for women to stay unmarried unless they were to join a nunnery. These ideas are reflected in the play, during the course of Act 1 it becomes clear to the audience that Benedick has no interest in getting married, as he says â€Å"Pick out my eyes with a ballad-maker’s pen, and hang me up at the door of a brothel house for the sign of blind Cupid† indicating that he believes that men are cuckolds an d are always deceived by their wives. He also plans to be a bachelor forever, Beatrice also shares his beliefs on staying single and claims that she would rather hear her ‘dog bark at a crow than a man swears’ his love to her, however once they realise their love for each other, they lose those ‘lost’ beliefs and they are guided by their love for each other. Hero and Claudio’s relationship is the only pairing that follows the stereotypical rules of courtly love; the man, Claudio, pursues the woman, Hero and their love is based on mutual attraction. Their relationship is extremely public and prominent throughout the play (however most of the audience’s attention is on the more believable relationship of Beatrice and Benedick). Claudio and Hero seem to fall in an immediate and intense love within minutes of being in each other’s presence, however their love is undoubtedly shallow and based on the lustful attraction of the young and naà ¯ve pair, however it is also clear that Claudio only cares for himself and wants to wed Hero for more selfish motives; in Act _ Scene _ Claudio enquires ‘____’ He questions about Hero’s siblings and Leonato’s inheritance rather than about Hero, her personality or the like. Claudio also states ‘lovingly’ â€Å"Can the world buy such a jewel?† when talking of Hero which shows that his interest lies in her looks, wealth and little more. Hero attempts to take the role of the perfect daughter and tries to please her father, Leonato, by going along with the wedding and getting married to the soldier she barely knows. She does not speak often throughout the play in stark contrast to her extroverted cousin, Beatrice. Hero’s silence and obedience shows the stern social boundaries that are set for her as a woman in the Elizabethan era. In sonnet 116 Shakespeare also writes about love never changing and being constant â€Å"Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks, but bears it out even to the edge of doom† This is saying that even in the roughest of conditions true love will continue and lovers will continue to love, in Much Ado About Nothing Beatrice and Benedick shows signs of true love when the wedding of Hero and Claudio is ruined and Benedick challenges Claudio to a duel in the honour of Beatrice and Hero. .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e , .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e .postImageUrl , .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e , .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e:hover , .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e:visited , .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e:active { border:0!important; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e:active , .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u2f09c2a0d95263895cad636b687f521e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Romeo And Juliet Argumentative EssayIn Much Ado About Nothing Act 4 Scene 1 is the first time that Beatrice and Benedick admit their true feelings to one another, in line 62 Benedick declares â€Å"I do love nothing in the world so well as you. Is that not strange?† He ends his declaration with a question because he has never felt this way before. Shakespeare uses questions in many of his sonnets; Sonnet 18’s very first line begins with a question. â€Å" Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day† The sonnet continues to talk about how the lover’s â€Å"eternal summer shall not fade† meaning her beauty and youth will last forever and in the final two lines of the sonnet, Shakespeare writes â€Å"So long as men can breathe or eyes can see, So long lives and this gives life to thee† This is much like Benedick’s line later on in Act 4 Scene 1where he announces â€Å"Come, bid me do anything for thee† Benedick says this in order to try and prove to Beatrice that he is willing to do anything for her and that his feelings for her are real.